Network
member Gráinne de Búrca (NYU Law) has alerted us to a new article she has
posted on SSRN, entitled “International Law Before the Courts: the EuropeanUnion and the United States Compared.”
The article is forthcoming from the Virginia Journal ofInternational Law. The abstract is below and the full article
may be downloaded here.
* * *
Against the background of a broadly shared perception of the
US and the EU as very different kinds of international actors, and a related
assumption that the approaches of the US Supreme Court and the European Court
of Justice towards the internalization of international law are also very
different, this article takes a systematic look at the approaches of the
European Court of Justice and the US Supreme Court to the internalization of
international law over the decade 2002-2012. The perception of the US in recent
decades has been as a frequently unilateralist and exceptionalist actor in
international relations, with the Supreme Court remaining resistant to law
which emanates from outside the American legislative process, or which lacks a
clear domestic imprimatur as applicable US law. The EU, by comparison, is seen
as having a greater commitment to multilateralism and to the development and
observance of international law, and the case-law of the Court of Justice has
until recently been broadly viewed – with WTO jurisprudence seen as an
exception – as actively contributing to shaping that image through its embrace
and internalization of international law norms. The analysis over a ten-year
period of the case law of the two courts dealing with international law
suggests that, rather than a simplified picture of the Supreme Court as the
skeptical judicial arm of an internationally exceptionalist United States and
the CJEU as the embracing judicial arm of an open and internationalist European
Union, there are many more commonalities between the approaches of the two
courts than conventional depictions acknowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment