* * *
Britain
is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old
understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the
British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved
legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new
Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation
can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and
historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime
that places external, rule-of-law-based limits on Parliament? Much of this
commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account
for the systemic factors at play in the British system.
This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.
This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid.
No comments:
Post a Comment